By Michael A. Lindenberger
TIME Magazine (online)
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
TIME Magazine (online)
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
With an 111-page legal brief that has surprised legal scholars, Brown
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3a60/d3a606a82ea6c3b01c419225f88784b557f8e95c" alt=""
Rights like that, he came to believe, can't be taken away, at least not by something as simple as constitutional amendment by popular vote. Instead, those rights he said, are "inalienable" in the same sense that the Declaration of Independence speaks of inalienable rights.
Brown said reaction to his position has been mixed, with supporters of gay marriage obviously cheering. Others, he said, have been less excited. But after more than four decades of public life, and no plans to quit anytime soon, Brown seemed to relish the historic significant of the case. "Isn't this what the Federalist Papers were all about? What Madison was after?"
Read the rest here.
1 comment:
Some good news!
Post a Comment