LONDON - March 3, 2010
The House of Lords agreed an amendment to the Equality Bill which would allow, but not compel, religious organisations to host the occasions.
Gay rights campaigners celebrated the change, but opponents said it could be impractical and undermine marriage.
Peers voted by a majority of 74 in favour of the amendment, which was not backed by the government.
It is yet to be approved by the Commons, but it is thought to be unlikely that MPs would make any significant changes.
'Religious freedom'
Labour peer Lord Alli proposed the amendment, telling the Lords: "There are many gay and lesbian couples who want to share their civil partnership with the congregations that they worship with.
"And there are a number of religious organisations that want to allow gay and lesbian couples to do exactly that."
We, like the government and the courts, have been quite clear ever since civil partnerships were introduced that they are not the same as marriage
Bishop of Bradford
He said: "In the end it comes down to an issue of religious freedom."
It was not an "attack" on the Church of England or the Catholic Church, he added.
Lord Alli said: "Religious freedom requires us to let others do things that we ourselves would not do. Religious freedom cannot begin and end with what one religion wants."
Read the rest of the story here.
No comments:
Post a Comment